Why "The Gander"?

Why "The Gander"?

Most people are familiar with the mythology of St. Martin's cloak. Less familiar may be the myth of St. Martin's goose. It is told that Martin the priest was wanted as bishop. He didn't want the job, and so hid (here the accounts are fuzzy) in a goose pen, barn, or bush and was revealed by the honking of the goose. A gander is a male goose - much like a drake is a male duck. To "take a gander" means to take a peek, a look. We hope to use this space to take a deeper look at things happening at St. Martin's, and share more thoughts and information with you.

Thursday, October 9, 2014

POWER Spring 2014 Voter Engagement Results

Howard Bilofsky and David Mosenkis of Germantown Jewish Center have just published an article about POWER’s s voter education drive. I still struggle with the words of the article. When Howard explained it to me, I could get it from the graph. Here is the article followed by my interpretation of the graph.

Effectiveness of POWER’s Spring 2014 Voter Engagement Campaign

POWER targeted low income, infrequent voters in our Spring 2014 voter engagement campaign leading up to the May 2014 primary election.  Overall,  19% of registered voters in Philadelphia turned out to vote in that election.  But the population POWER targeted had a lower turnout rate of 10%.  This rate would have been even lower were it not for POWER’s outreach to that population.  Voters in the population that POWER volunteers touched (by talking to them in person and on the phone or leaving a message) had a turnout rate of 25%.  Voters who POWER touched and who committed to vote had a turnout rate of 38%.  So voters POWER reached were 2.5 times as likely to vote as the overall population, and voters who POWER garnered commitments from were nearly 4 times as likely to vote.

Voter Turnout for Low Income Infrequent Voters


Interpretation of the Graph

You see the dotted line down the middle. That represents the per cent of Philadelphia’s registered voters who turned out to vote in the May 2014 election, 19% (shamefully low, I think).

You see the little box on the top. That shows the rate at which infrequent voters turned out to vote. Only 9%. In other election cycles, 9% would be above average for infrequent voters. POWER raised the total rate.

You see the middle box. That shows the rate at which infrequent voters who had received a communication from POWER voted. Instead of 9%, 25% of infrequent voters who heard from POWER voted .

The bottom box shows the rate at which those who committed to vote in response to POWER voted. 38% of infrequent voters who told POWER that they would vote actually went to the polls and voted.

ASTONISHING! Now look at the numbers of infrequent voters who have committed to vote so far in our fall campaign. In just two sessions with 11 phoners, we have gotten 140 commitments. We had 177 actual conversations, so far. So 79% of the people we talk to commit to vote. We know from our May experience that if they commit, they are very likely to follow through.

We still have three Sundays (12:30 to 3:00 p.m.) and one Wednesday (Oct 22 4:00 to 6:00 p.m.) on which we can call. Jess Ballenger has become extremely competent in training and guiding us in the process. This work gives a sense of accomplishment and confidence that we are building a community of education voters. Please sign up here to come try it out. 


-The Rev. Carol Duncan